top of page

Benchmark case: VENTO AEC vs FDS

  • 作家相片: Paolo Casula
    Paolo Casula
  • 2024年6月12日
  • 讀畢需時 1 分鐘

已更新:5月29日


ree

In this specific case, our aim is to compare the performances of  VENTO AEC and FDS  (Fire Dynamics Simulator), demonstrating the seamless alignment between the two softwares.


The benchmark case is built upon the FDS parametres described in Annex D of the guide “Design methodologies of smoke and heat exhaust ventilation” (Morgan et al. 1999).


The case involves a fire scenario within a shop located in a simplified multi-storey shopping mall. 


The fire originates in  the shop and the resulting smoke spreads across the mall’s ceiling. The fire’s heat is generated by a 3m x 3m fire with a power of 7.7 MW. About 35% of the energy is radiative, and the remaining 65% is convective.


The results show the smoke distribution and the velocity vectors over the vertical symmetry plane, with VENTO’s output (Figure 1) being seamlessly aligned to the result from FDS (Figure 2). 


Figure 1: analysis output generated by VENTO AEC 


Figure 2: analysis output generated by FDS





 
 
 
Vento CFD logo

办公地址: Viale la Plaia 15, 09123, 卡利亚里

 

法定地址:Via Goffredo Mameli 115, 09123, Cagliari

 

 

 

© - Vento CFD srl VAT IT03698400920 保留所有权利。

 

PMI-Registroimprese.it

Vento 计算流体力学

主页

风荷载

户外舒适

接触

销售团队

基本信息

联系我们

室内舒适度

风险分析

技术规格

验证

解决方案

项目

关于

政策

隐私政策

社会的
Vento CFD LinkedIn icon
Vento CFD YouTube icon

Cookie 政策

bottom of page